来源：http://www.zzzhongtebao.com/ 点击次数： 发布时间：2018-05-26
Low price service fee can not guarantee the minimum cost of employment at all, so we have to take the form of "lack of people and no job" to reduce the number of contract contracts, in order to increase the labor intensity and workload of the workers and maintain the basic wage expenditure. Of course, there are some enterprises in the low price competition of the big background, such as not to participate in low price competition, means that it will lose a lot of business, but must not be. This way of competition is actually "grabbing others' bills and breaking their own path". Such enterprises only care about immediate interests and the so-called increase of market share. Apparently, it seems to be a smart trick, which is seriously endangering the healthy development of the market.
The management model is incompatible with the development law of the market economy, is incompatible with the healthy development of the industry, and is contrary to the optimization of the industry structure, and is inconsistent with the industry transformation and upgrading. Its inevitable result will lead to a large number of labor disputes, and may even cause the employees to vent their discontent in the post and bury the hidden dangers, including the possible cause of collective petitions and other adverse effects on the society. According to the statistics of the labor arbitration department, the labor dispute cases in the security industry have been rising in a straight line in recent years, which is caused by the low price competition causing serious damage to the legitimate rights and interests of the employees.
Low price competition, and customer units in order to obtain "low price service", the use of security services between enterprises to fight the opportunity, regardless of the legal minimum cost of labor, but also regardless of the "low price service" will bury the security risks and so on, deliberately repeatedly depressed the price. Therefore, low price competition has a very close relationship with low end customers' mentality of "the lowest price can also be sold to service".
In fact, in the price game, enterprises can completely rely on their own advantages and potential, rely on excellent corporate culture, quality and efficient service quality, and constantly innovate and upgrade the management and service mode, in order to win the price war.